OEE Formula: A Worked Manufacturing Example
Calculate availability, performance, quality and OEE from one manufacturing shift. Check units, reconcile losses and reproduce the example in ORDREL.
LEAN, CLOSE TO THE WORK
Learn just enough to take the next step. Work with real observations, clear definitions and a review date.
Understand the pace required
Compare workload and available time
Observe the real flow
Choose a useful focus
Test the explanation
Run a bounded trial
Make the better method repeatable
Keep ownership and review visible
Connect these methods through Operational Excellence
Manufacturing safety guides on machine risk assessment, guarding, hazardous energy, the hierarchy of controls and pinch or rotating hazards.
Recognize the 8 Wastes, run a Waste Walk and distinguish time released from cash savings.
THE ORDREL OPERATIONS MAP
Start where the work needs attention. Return to earlier steps as you learn.
Understand the pace required
3 methods · explore →The demand-based production pace: available production time divided by required customer demand.
Use it to compare the pace customers require with observed cycle time and planned capacity.
420 available minutes divided by 840 required units gives a takt of 30 seconds per unit.
Use the same period and units. Takt is not the observed cycle time and does not include an invented demand.
A visual or digital signal that authorizes replenishment or movement when downstream demand consumes a defined amount.
Use it when work is pushed ahead without need, queues grow or replenishment decisions are unclear.
An empty two-bin container signals replenishment while the second bin covers normal lead time.
Set quantities from demand, lead time and variation. A card alone cannot fix unreliable supply or unstable quality.
Providing the needed item, in the needed amount, when it is needed—based on real demand rather than unchecked production.
Use it when excess inventory, long lead times or overproduction separate work from customer demand.
A downstream withdrawal triggers replenishment of a defined container instead of a schedule pushing unlimited stock.
Reducing inventory without reliable flow, quality and replenishment rules can expose the customer to shortages.
Compare workload and available time
3 methods · explore →A structured comparison of workload, productive time, work rate, skill coverage and the people assigned.
Use it before a shift, demand change or staffing decision when the assumptions need to be discussed openly.
1,500 labor minutes divided by 384 productive minutes per person gives a four-person arithmetic baseline.
A calculated headcount is not a complete staffing plan. Check skills, breaks, minimum coverage, variation and process limits.
A focused review of the step currently limiting the output of the whole process.
Use it when demand exceeds throughput, queues build or one step consistently controls the pace.
Mapping shows inspection can release 42 orders per hour while the next-slowest step can release 55, so inspection is investigated first.
The constraint can move after an improvement. Recheck the whole flow instead of optimizing one station forever.
Smoothing the mix and volume of work over time instead of releasing large uneven batches.
Use it when demand patterns and batch choices create peaks, starvation, overtime or excess inventory.
A line sequences three product families in smaller repeating intervals rather than producing a full week of each at once.
Leveling cannot erase real demand variation or changeover constraints. Test the sequence against capacity and service needs.
Observe the real flow
6 methods · explore →A structured observation of how long defined work takes under stated conditions.
Use it to understand cycle variation, establish a baseline or support capacity and improvement discussions.
A team records 20 comparable completion intervals and notes product mix, exclusions and interruptions.
Define the boundary and observation mode first. A small sample is descriptive, not proof of a stable standard.
A visual record of steps, decisions, handoffs, waits and boundaries in the current process.
Use it when teams describe the same process differently or need to see where work loops and waits.
An order map separates six minutes of entry work from two approval queues and one rework loop.
Map the real current state at a useful level. A polished diagram of the intended process can hide the problem.
A current- and future-state view of material and information flow across an end-to-end product or service stream.
Use it when local improvements have not reduced total lead time or when several functions share the outcome.
A team maps ten minutes of processing across a five-day order journey and targets the largest information queues.
Choose one product family and a clear boundary. Do not confuse a detailed process map with an end-to-end value stream.
Moving work through connected steps with as little waiting, batching and work-in-process as the process allows.
Use it when queues and large transfer batches lengthen lead time or hide defects between steps.
Instead of moving 50 forms at once, a team passes smaller groups to the next review step throughout the hour.
Do not force one-piece flow where safety, cure time, testing or product mix requires a different design.
Going to the place where work happens to observe the actual process and learn with the people doing it.
Use it before changing a process, when reports conflict with reality or when the team needs shared facts.
A supervisor follows one order from release through packing and records handoffs, waits and rework loops.
A gemba walk is not an inspection tour. Ask, observe and respect the work instead of arriving with a verdict.
Work, delay or resource use that does not create the result the customer needs; Lean commonly groups waste into recognizable patterns.
Use it while observing a process to name excess motion, waiting, defects, overproduction, inventory, transport or processing.
An order waits two days for a signature even though the actual review takes four minutes.
Do not label people as waste. Study the system and distinguish necessary supporting work from avoidable effort.
Choose a useful focus
5 methods · explore →Availability × performance × quality: the share of planned production time equivalent to making good output at the ideal rate.
Use it to separate equipment-related production loss into downtime, speed and quality components.
90% availability × 92.59% performance × 96% quality gives 80% OEE.
Define planned time, ideal rate and good output consistently. OEE is not labor utilization.
Ranking comparable categories from largest to smallest and showing their cumulative contribution.
Use it to choose where to investigate first when many loss or defect categories compete for attention.
Twelve missing identifiers, six address issues and two other returns show the first category is 60% of the sample.
The largest category is not automatically the root cause. Keep categories exclusive and use one measure at a time.
A practical grouping of equipment loss: breakdowns, setup and adjustment, small stops, reduced speed, startup rejects and production rejects.
Use it to move from one OEE number to the loss categories that deserve investigation.
A line separates a 30-minute breakdown from repeated 40-second stops instead of combining both as “downtime.”
Choose definitions that fit the process and avoid double-counting overlapping losses.
A small set of measures that show whether important operational outcomes and process conditions are moving as intended.
Use them when a team needs a consistent review of safety, quality, delivery, cost or improvement progress.
A daily board shows accepted output, plan attainment, first-pass quality and overdue actions using fixed definitions.
Every KPI shapes behavior. Pair outcomes with context and avoid targets that reward local optimization or hidden problems.
A visible or audible signal that makes an abnormal condition and the need for help clear in real time.
Use it when problems remain hidden until the end of a run or operators cannot quickly call for support.
A station light changes when a material mismatch is detected so the team can respond before more work continues.
A signal without a defined response, authority and escalation path becomes background noise.
Test the explanation
3 methods · explore →A cause-and-effect map that organizes possible explanations around a clearly defined outcome.
Use it when several cause families may contribute and the team needs to plan evidence checks.
Seal leaks are explored across machine, method, material, measurement, people and environment hypotheses.
Branches are hypotheses, not verified causes. Record what evidence would support or weaken each one.
A questioning technique for building and testing a causal explanation one link at a time.
Use it for a specific problem when the team can examine evidence behind each proposed why.
A wrong leaflet leads the team from the observed pack to staging and changeover checks, with evidence required at every link.
Five is not a quota. Branch when mechanisms differ and do not treat consensus as proof.
A disciplined investigation of the mechanisms and system conditions that allow a defined problem to occur.
Use it when containment is complete but the problem may recur unless the enabling conditions change.
A team checks the actual material, method, records and failure path before choosing a corrective action.
There may be interacting causes. Stop the causal chain where evidence stops and avoid defaulting to blame.
Run a bounded trial
6 methods · explore →A concise improvement story that connects the current condition, target, analysis, countermeasure and follow-up.
Use it when a team needs one shared view of a problem and the reasoning behind the proposed change.
A team records a 40-minute changeover baseline, tests advance staging and checks quality as well as time.
Filling every box does not prove the explanation. Keep evidence and uncertainty visible.
Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control: a staged method for improving an existing process with evidence.
Use it for a recurring, measurable problem that needs a longer investigation and a sustained control plan.
A team defines a defect measure, validates collection, checks causes, trials one change and assigns a response to drift.
The stages can loop. Moving forward with an unreliable measure only makes the later analysis look more certain than it is.
Plan, Do, Check, Act: a short learning cycle for stating an expectation, testing it, reviewing evidence and adapting.
Use it for focused changes where the team can run a bounded test and learn quickly.
Plan a new staging rule, trial it on one approved shift, compare search time and quality, then adopt or revise it.
“Do” is a test, not a permanent rollout. Define the expected result and guardrails before starting.
Continuous improvement through frequent learning and practical changes made with the people who know the work.
Use it to build an everyday improvement habit rather than waiting for only large projects.
A team tests a new material location for one week, reviews travel time and adjusts the standard together.
Kaizen is not a suggestion box. Ideas need a problem, a test, an owner and a check of what changed.
A systematic way to reduce changeover time by moving suitable work outside the stop, simplifying internal work and standardizing the sequence.
Use it when long setups force large batches, reduce availability or make the schedule less responsive.
Tooling and verified materials are prepared before shutdown, while internal adjustment steps are simplified and timed.
Do not transfer unsafe or unmeasured work to another person or shift merely to make the recorded stop look shorter.
Designing a process to prevent a specific error or detect it before the consequence travels downstream.
Use it when a repeat error mechanism is understood and a practical prevention or detection control can be tested.
A connector is keyed so the wrong orientation cannot be assembled, then challenged under controlled conditions.
Training and reminders may help, but they do not physically or logically prevent the error.
Make the better method repeatable
4 methods · explore →The current agreed best method for performing repeatable work safely, consistently and visibly.
Use it after learning has established a reliable sequence, or when variation in method creates avoidable problems.
A cell documents the work sequence, key quality points, expected time and response to an abnormal condition.
Standard work must be usable and revisable. Freezing a poor method only standardizes the waste.
A repeatable way to sort, organize, clean, standardize and sustain a workplace. 6S adds safety as an explicit lens.
Use it when clutter, searching, unclear locations or changing workplace conditions make work harder to perform consistently.
A packing cell marks tool locations, removes obsolete supplies and adds a weekly check with an owner.
A one-day cleanup is not 5S. The standard and follow-up routine are what make the change last.
A shared approach to equipment effectiveness that combines planned maintenance, operator care, loss prevention and continuous improvement.
Use it when recurring equipment conditions reduce availability, speed or quality and ownership is fragmented.
Operators complete defined cleaning and inspection while maintenance analyzes repeat failures and plans deeper work.
Operator care must not transfer technical work beyond training or authorization. Protect planned maintenance time.
Building the ability to detect an abnormal condition, stop or contain it and prevent defects from continuing downstream.
Use it when equipment or a process can recognize a meaningful failure and needs a clear response.
A sensor detects a missing component and prevents the next cycle until the approved check is completed.
Automatic stopping must be designed around consequence, safe recovery, false alarms and bypass risk.
Keep ownership and review visible
4 methods · explore →A two-way transfer of current status, unresolved risks, temporary controls and next actions between teams.
Use it wherever work, equipment or decisions continue across shifts or owners.
The outgoing team records the line state, pending approval and next-action owner; the incoming team confirms the critical points.
A completed form does not prove understanding and must not replace permits, releases or required escalation.
Making normal conditions, priorities, progress and abnormalities understandable at the place and time of work.
Use it when teams must ask for basic status or when a problem is visible only after reports are compiled.
A shift board shows plan, accepted output, constraints and owned actions with consistent definitions.
More boards do not mean more clarity. Remove stale measures and design the response to abnormal status.
Goals written to be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound.
Use them when a vague intention needs a clear result, owner and review date.
Reduce median approval waiting time from 18 hours to 10 hours by November 30 while maintaining the defined quality check.
A precise target can still be the wrong target. Connect it to the customer and the process, not only a deadline.
A management process that connects a few strategic priorities to measurable work, owners and review routines.
Use it when departments pursue too many disconnected projects or daily work is detached from strategy.
A site turns a delivery priority into a small set of annual breakthroughs, team measures and monthly reviews.
A cascade of targets is not alignment if teams cannot surface conflicts, capacity limits or learning.
Turn workload, available time and rate into a capacity conversation.
Plan staffingSee where losses concentrate. Check the evidence before choosing a countermeasure.
Explore Pareto LabSeparate the value of time released from money you can actually save.
Estimate the valueNEW TO LEAN?
Lean is a way to understand how work flows, what gets in its way, and how a team can improve it through small, checked changes.
Read the practical introduction →ORDREL / LEAN KNOWLEDGE HUB
Understand what each method does, when to use it and which ORDREL tool can help you put it into practice.
All Lean concepts →Guides with fictional examples, calculation checks and links to the working tools. Start with your question, then test the assumptions against your own process.
Calculate availability, performance, quality and OEE from one manufacturing shift. Check units, reconcile losses and reproduce the example in ORDREL.
Separate availability, speed and quality losses from schedule utilization. Use a reconciled OEE example without turning a generic target into a promise.
Estimate manufacturing operators from workload, labor time and productive time. Work through a staffing example, rounding, process caps and limitations.
Plan a manufacturing time study, distinguish observed time from a justified standard, and compare allowance conventions with a checked worked example.
Compare measured cycle time, demand-based takt and end-to-end lead time. Calculate a fictional shift and understand what each measure can tell you.
Work through a fictional packaging problem with 5 Whys, evidence checks and a countermeasure trial. Learn when to branch or stop an investigation.
Build a manufacturing fishbone diagram, separate observations from hypotheses and plan useful cause checks before choosing countermeasures.
Connect an observed manufacturing gap to evidence, countermeasures, a trial and follow-up in an A3. Includes a fictional changeover example.
Use Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control to organize an existing-process investigation. See practical evidence and a fictional defect-rate example.
Rank manufacturing losses using comparable categories and a correct cumulative percentage. Distinguish a Pareto priority from a verified root cause.
Distinguish prevention, detection and warning in mistake-proofing. Plan safe challenge checks and connect a proposed control to a verified error mechanism.
Prepare a useful manufacturing shift handover with current status, open actions, temporary controls and receiver checks. Includes a fictional example.